Wallet showed repeated high-value market participation during the observation window.
Last active 12h ago
Not enough observed history to assess
Insufficient data· 4%smart-money@1 · scored 11h ago
The information on this page is market data and educational analysis, not financial advice. Past on-chain activity does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research.
Observations describe past on-chain activity during the observation window. They are not claims about future performance.
FIFO over observed transfers; realized ROI = (proceeds - cost) / cost on closed cycles; losses always included; display filters never alter these numbers.
Research data, not financial advice. Based on observed on-chain activity only; past performance does not predict future results.
Analyzed 17 days of observed activity (2026-07-12 → 2026-07-28), out of a 365-day requested window — history truncated at 5,000 of 6,492 transfers.
Realized ROI
+0.00%
over 17d actually observed
Win rate
0%
0 of 7 closed positions
Early entry rate
0%
entries before volume expansion
Median hold
0h
per closed position
Max drawdown
0%
worst observed peak-to-trough
Gross volume · 30d
$20K
100 transactions · gross, both directions
Estimated unrealized PnL +$0 across 1 priced position
Estimates from observed on-chain transfers (FIFO cost basis over the 17d actually observed of a 365-day window) and the latest daily close known at ingestion — not an account statement, not advice. Tokens acquired before the window are excluded.
✓ Source data · 2 days old · newest datum 2026-07-26 18:12 UTC
✓ Written 2026-07-26 18:12 UTC · model claude-sonnet-5
✓ Platform report — generated for everyone, free to read
Observed flow over the trailing 90 days shows gross $0 in both directions, matched round-trip volume of $0, net directional flow of $0, across 0 transactions. Unlike a router pattern (large gross offset by near-zero net), this wallet recorded no transaction volume at all in the measured window. No router thesis or trading thesis can be built on this period — the data simply shows an absence of recorded activity.
The Smart Money score of 44 is built from seven weighted components. Two components carry the score: Portfolio behavior (59) and Risk profile (100) are the highest inputs recorded. Historical ROI (25) contributes moderately. Three components drag the score toward the low end: Win rate (0), Early entries (0), and Holding duration (0) — each recorded at the floor. Successful trades (13) sits low-to-mid. The composite of 44 reflects a wallet where risk-profile and portfolio-behavior metrics are elevated while entry timing, win rate, and holding duration show no favorable signal in the data.
No transaction dates or timestamps are present in the supplied record. What is recorded: 7 closed positions total, described as a "limited track record" that pulls the score toward neutral. Positions were historically closed within days of opening (short-cycle behavior), and entries historically occurred after volume had already expanded. The 90-day flow window shows zero transactions, which does not resemble the longer closed-position history in volume, only in the absence of new activity.
Each factor is scored 0–100 from observed history, then combined by weight. Short track records shrink the final score toward a neutral 50.
⚠ History truncated: showing the newest 5,000 of 6,492 transfers.
The record does not disclose wallet ownership, holdings outside the tracked registry, or activity on other chains. No dates accompany the 7 closed positions, so cadence cannot be pinned to calendar periods. The zero-transaction 90-day window does not indicate dormancy of the underlying owner, only of this tracked address in this dataset.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
AI-generated analyses are automated interpretations of public market data. They may contain errors, are provided for educational purposes only, and are not investment recommendations.