Monitor market trends with AI-generated educational analysis.
AI-generated analyses are automated interpretations of public market data. They may contain errors, are provided for educational purposes only, and are not investment recommendations.
Research assistant
Grounded in our tracked data · 2 credits per question
Tap a starter to fill the box (it does not send until you press Ask — each question costs 2 credits):
Answers describe observed historical data only — educational information, not financial advice. Failed answers are never charged.
Conviction analysis
Deterministic conviction scores - observed whale, smart-money, on-chain, price and sentiment data, with every component and gap shown. Open a token with recent whale activity:
Observed flow over the 90-day window shows gross $0 (both directions), matched round-trip $0, net directional $0, across 0 transactions. This figure sits in direct tension with the "Recent events" list below, which records numerous multi-hundred-thousand to multi-million dollar transfers between 2026-07-22 and 2026-07-24. Taken at face value, the stated 90-day aggregate reads as a near-zero net against what the event log shows to be non-zero gross activity — a pattern consistent with funds passing through rather than accumulating. No trader thesis can be built on a net-zero aggregate; it describes throughput, not conviction.
Data and provenance
The event log provided spans 2026-07-22 07:02Z to 2026-07-24 23:32Z — roughly 65 hours of recorded activity, ten discrete events. No data is given on activity before 2026-07-22 or after 2026-07-24, and no confirmation is provided that this is a complete or truncated history. Chains other than Ethereum are not covered. Holdings outside the tracked registry, and any transfers that moved without an attached USD price, are not represented above and are treated here as unknown.
Behaviour analysis
The Smart Money score of 45 is built from: Historical ROI 25, Win rate 0, Early entries 0, Successful trades 13, Holding duration 0, Portfolio behavior 89, Risk profile 100. Portfolio behavior (89) and Risk profile (100) carry the score; Win rate (0), Early entries (0), and Holding duration (0) are stated gaps that drag it down, with no supporting data behind them. Historical observations note realized ROI over the observation window of +0.00%, with 17% of closed positions ending in positive PnL out of a limited track record of 6 closed positions — explicitly adjusted toward neutral due to sample size.
Cadence in the recent event log is dense and directional-reversing: a $1.6M NAORIS accumulation and $1.3M USDT accumulation on 2026-07-22 and 2026-07-24 respectively, sit alongside a $7.5M USDT distribution recorded 2026-07-22 12:01Z. The three events that most define this record: the 2026-07-22 12:01Z distribution of $7,523,523; the 2026-07-22 10:50Z outbound transfer of $2,748,148; and the 2026-07-24 06:59Z accumulation of $1,265,533.
aEthwstETH intelligence report
2026-07-27 20:47 UTC · claude-sonnet-5
Summary
The deterministic engine scored this token 67/100, direction BULLISH, confidence MEDIUM. That score sat within the 66–67 range observed across the two snapshots recorded since 2026-07-26, so it represented continuity rather than a fresh signal. The dossier showed concentrated whale buy pressure ($220.7M observed buy-side vs $22.1M sell-side across 128 events), a price sitting at 99% of its 30-day range after a 22.4% 30-day move, and a holder base where the top 10 non-exchange addresses held 48.6%–49.3% of tracked supply depending on the data pull. Volume and market cap were both unavailable, which is a stated gap rather than a reassuring absence.
Data and provenance
Of 11 applicable conviction components, only 5 carried data (56.0% of applicable weight): whale activity, on-chain activity, token fundamentals, technical indicators, and macro conditions. Six were empty gaps: smart-money flows (0 scored wallets, minimum 3 required), liquidity (volume/mcap unavailable), news sentiment (0 scored items, minimum 2), social sentiment (0 scored items, minimum 3), institutional activity (not tracked for crypto in V1), and ETF flows (not tracked for crypto in V1). Whale events were logged from 2026-07-22 through 2026-07-27, all attributable to two addresses: 0xb8a451107a9f87fde481d4d686247d6e43ed715e and 0x181cb55f872450d16ae858d532b4e35e50eaa76d. Holder structure was based on the 50 largest holders on record. Disclosed institutional exposure: none found in tracked 13F/N-PORT filings — this states absence from tracked filings, not absence from the asset. Scored news: nothing in the tracked feed mentioned this asset recently. No unlocks were scheduled in tracked emissions data. Price momentum came from 365 daily closes through 2026-07-27.
On-chain analysis
The score was carried primarily by whale activity (36.4% weight, +0.3 contribution, quality 1.00) and technical indicators (27.3% weight, +0.1 contribution, quality 0.95). Whale activity reflected 128 events across 6 wallets with $220.7M in observed buys against $22.1M in sells. Technical indicators reflected a 3.2% 7-day move and 22.4% 30-day move, with price at 99% of its 30-day range. The component most limiting confidence was the liquidity gap: volume or market cap was unavailable entirely, so there is no basis in this dossier to assess how easily a position could be exited.
USDD intelligence report
2026-07-27 20:46 UTC · claude-sonnet-5
Summary
The deterministic engine scored USDD at 56/100, direction BULLISH, confidence HIGH. This score sits above the 47-51 range recorded across six snapshots since 2026-07-24, and the direction flipped from Neutral to Bullish since the prior read at 2026-07-27 07:18 UTC. The dossier showed a token trading at $0.998935, essentially flat over 7 and 30 days, with observed whale buy pressure ($27.3M) exceeding sell pressure ($15.5M) across 44 events, set against a holder base where the top 10 non-exchange addresses controlled 98.0% of supply. Price stability, rising transaction counts, and elevated turnover were the layers driving the read; holder concentration remained the dominant counter-signal.
Data and provenance
Six of eleven conviction components carried data (63.0% of applicable weight): whale activity, on-chain activity, token fundamentals, liquidity, technical indicators, and macro conditions. Five were empty and contributed nothing: smartmoneyflows (0 scored wallets vs. a minimum 3), newssentiment (0 items vs. minimum 2), socialsentiment (0 items vs. minimum 3), institutionalactivity (not tracked for crypto in V1), and etfflows (not tracked for crypto in V1). Holder structure data showed top-10 non-exchange concentration at 98.0%, exchange custody at 0.0%, and tracked smart wallets at 0.0%. No token unlocks were found in tracked emissions data (not proof none exist). No disclosed institutional exposure appeared in tracked 13F/N-PORT filings. Scored news returned nothing for this asset in the tracked feed. Price momentum data covered 365 daily closes through 2026-07-27.
On-chain analysis
Two components carried the bulk of the signal: whale activity (32.3% weight, +0.1 contribution, quality 1.00) built on $27.3M in observed buys against $15.5M in sells across 44 events and 5 wallets, and technical indicators (24.2% weight, quality 0.86) reflecting -0.0% over 7 days and 0.0% over 30 days, with price sitting at 50% of its 30-day range. The component most limiting confidence was token fundamentals (9.7% weight, -0.1 contribution): top-10 non-exchange holders at 98.0% of supply.
Flow detail: wallet 0x7b8591d3ea97d6035672ab2d5bdb0b6ce97b7c3a executed a round-trip on 2026-07-25 18:38Z — received $1,498,553 in USDD, swapped 1.4M sUSDD into it, then sold $1,498,668 of USDD into USDT within the same minute-window, and had earlier sent $4,802,758 out on 2026-07-19 03:21Z. That sequence reads as transit/rotation rather than sustained accumulation. Separately, 0x08848b5c2e80488fa9d6df900d4603f2356a02e0 and 0x4b88215dceaf76da260c7ef3ba6d5b6663681396 exchanged $999,477 between each other on 2026-07-23 10:40-10:41Z, and 0x29065a4c1f2f20d1e263930088890d6f49fe715a received $947,504 on 2026-07-23 13:04Z with no offsetting outflow logged.
WBTC intelligence report
2026-07-27 20:46 UTC · claude-sonnet-5
Summary
The deterministic engine scored WBTC at 27/100, direction BEARISH, confidence HIGH. This is a computed output, not an analytical conclusion drawn here. The dossier shows a token with a 0.26% 24h price change, a structure health score of 49/100, and heavy net distribution across tracked whale wallets over the last 7 days. Price momentum data, however, showed a positive 30-day move, creating two measured disagreements between price action and both wallet-flow and conviction-score readings. Coverage was partial: only 6 of 11 conviction components carried data (63.0% of applicable weight).
Data and provenance
Whale events (434 across 7 wallets), holder structure (top-10 non-exchange 53.7%, exchange custody 0.2%, tracked smart wallets 0.0%), liquidity ($97,262,750 24h volume vs $7,526,976,410 mcap), and price momentum (365 daily closes) all carried data. Token fundamentals and macro conditions also had data, though the latter was capped and only 58% quality. Smart-money flows, news sentiment, and social sentiment were stated gaps — 0 scored wallets, 0 scored news items, 0 scored social items, each below the engine's minimum thresholds. Institutional activity and ETF flows are not tracked for crypto in this engine version. Disclosed institutional exposure: none found in tracked 13F/N-PORT filings — stated as absent from filings, not absent from the asset. Upcoming unlocks: none scheduled in tracked emissions data, which the dossier explicitly notes is not proof none exist. Scored news: nothing in the tracked feed mentioned this asset recently.
On-chain analysis
The score was carried primarily by whale activity (32.3% weight, -0.3 contribution) and on-chain activity (16.1% weight, -0.2 contribution). The whale component reflected $27.6M in observed buy pressure against $2,082.3M in sell pressure across 434 events. The on-chain component reflected a week-over-week transaction drop, 586 in the last 7 days versus 1,517 the week before. Technical indicators (24.2% weight) carried the lowest quality score (0.43) and most limits confidence. Flows: wallet 0x547b5ad9f71ac50efd8755bc144767ac1768fc3d showed repeated same-transaction pass-throughs of $347.0M (net $0, transit not accumulation) on 2026-07-27 at 05:53Z, 06:18Z, and 06:44Z, alongside a net $333,641,704 distribution over 7 days. Wallet 0xbb2b8038a1640196fbe3e38816f3e67cba72d940 received $26,488,847 (18:13Z) and $13,393,516 (16:03Z), and sent $39,402,854 (12:44Z) — inflows and an outflow of similar magnitude on the same day. Top-10 non-exchange holders at 53.7% and exchange custody at just 0.2% suggest concentrated non-exchange wallets, not exchanges, hold the ability to move price; tracked smart wallets held 0.0%. Turnover of 1.29% (24h volume against mcap) is the measured liquidity backdrop for any large exit. Per the measured disagreements: wallet flow pointed down (bought $27,604,775, sold $2,108,142,796) while price over 30 days pointed up (+8.1%); separately, the conviction score (27/100, bearish) diverged from the same +8.1% 30-day price move. Both could reflect distribution occurring into a price that had not yet reflected it, or price drivers not captured by the tracked wallet sample — the dossier does not resolve which.
weETH intelligence report
2026-07-27 20:45 UTC · claude-sonnet-5
Summary
The deterministic conviction engine scored this asset at 61/100, direction BULLISH, confidence MEDIUM. That score sat above the 57-59 range observed across five snapshots since 2026-07-23. The dossier showed heavy whale buy-side flow ($1,403.3M vs $52.2M sell across 408 events), a price sitting at 97% of its 30-day range, and a structure health score of 10/100 driven by extreme holder concentration (top-10 non-exchange holders at 86.9%) alongside 24h turnover of just 0.04% of market cap. Coverage was partial: only 6 of 11 applicable components carried data (63.0% of applicable weight).
Data and provenance
Of the 11 conviction components, whale activity, on-chain activity, token fundamentals, liquidity, technical indicators and macro conditions carried data. Five did not: smartmoneyflows (0 scored wallets active, minimum 3 required), newssentiment (0 scored items, minimum 2), socialsentiment (0 scored items, minimum 3), institutionalactivity and etfflows (not tracked for crypto in V1). Whale events were populated (408 events, 5 wallets, newest 2026-07-27 17:43Z). Holder structure was populated: top-10 non-exchange 86.9%, exchange custody 0.0%, tracked smart wallets 0.0%. No token unlocks were found in tracked emissions data — stated as an absence in the data, not proof none exist. No disclosed institutional exposure appeared in tracked 13F/N-PORT filings. Scored news carried nothing on this asset in the tracked feed. Price momentum data was populated: 7d +3.5%, 30d +23.4%, 90d -14.9%, -17.9% from the 90d high.
On-chain analysis
Whale activity (32.3% weight, quality 1.00) and on-chain activity (16.1% weight, quality 0.96) carried the bulk of the applicable weight and both contributed positively. Technical indicators carried the largest weight (24.2%) but the lowest quality (0.59), which most limits confidence. Wallet 0xbdfa7b7893081b35fb54027489e2bc7a38275129 showed a net inflow of $199,343,442 over 7 days (2026-07-26 22:37Z), flanked by paired $618,243 and $1,030,302 transfers minutes apart on 2026-07-26 — a pattern consistent with internal movement rather than fresh external accumulation for those specific legs. Wallet 0xdb74dfdd3bb46be8ce6c33dc9d82777bcfc3ded5 executed three WETH→weETH swaps (2026-07-26 20:37Z for $52,370; 2026-07-27 14:35Z for $193,580; 2026-07-27 17:43Z for $849,286), which are direct buys rather than transfers. With top-10 non-exchange holders controlling 86.9% of supply and exchange custody at 0.0%, price-moving capacity concentrates in a small number of non-custodial wallets; 24h volume of $1,618,652 against a $3,611,465,857 market cap indicates that exiting any sizable position would be difficult to do without moving price. Per the measured-disagreements block, the layers agreed: no conflict was recorded between flow direction and price momentum in this dossier.
About these reports
Reports are generated by Claude from our tracked on-chain and market intelligence. The generation policy forbids recommendations, predictions, and profit claims, and every output is automatically validated against prohibited wording before being stored.
Risks
The $7.5M distribution against smaller inbound accumulations concentrates this record around a handful of large transfers rather than many small ones. Historical observations show short-cycle behavior, positions closed within days, which could be misread as strategy rather than simple turnover. The classification UNKNOWN rests on a 6-position closed track record — thin evidence for any behavioral label.
What would change this read
Observable measurements to watch: whether the 90-day matched round-trip figure diverges from $0 as more transactions are recorded; whether the closed-position count grows beyond 6, changing the neutral adjustment; whether Win rate or Holding duration components populate with non-zero data.
Limitations and missing data
This record cannot establish wallet ownership, intent behind the transfers, or holdings outside the tracked registry. The mismatch between the stated 90-day zero-flow aggregate and the populated event log is not resolved by the data provided.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
Tracing the flows: 0xb8a451107a9f87fde481d4d686247d6e43ed715e swapped 10.7K WETH for ~4.8K aEthwstETH (~$20.6M) on 2026-07-22 18:05Z, then cycled through further receives and sends ($11.5M in, $12.0M out, $4.0M out, $7.5M in, $8.0M in) through 2026-07-23 08:25Z — a pattern the data logged as accumulation ($11.0M net inflow over 7 days) despite internal transit-like movements. Separately, 0x181cb55f872450d16ae858d532b4e35e50eaa76d sent $2.4M on 2026-07-27 16:16Z, logged as distribution with a $2.4M net outflow over 7 days. With top-10 non-exchange holders at 48.6% and exchange custody at 0.0%, price-moving capacity here rested with a small number of non-exchange wallets rather than exchange-held float.
Per the MEASURED DISAGREEMENTS block, the layers agreed: no conflict was flagged between the accumulation signal, the technical reading, and price momentum.
Risks
Top-10 non-exchange concentration stood at 48.6% (structure score −49 points on this factor alone), meaning a small holder set controlled roughly half of tracked supply. Tracked smart wallets were 0.0%, and smart-money stance was explicitly marked INSUFFICIENT with 0 scored wallets — consensus could not be claimed from that sample. Liquidity data (volume, market cap) was entirely absent, leaving no way to assess exit friction. Price sat 18.4% below its 90-day high and 23.3% above its 90-day low, per momentum data, while having fallen -15.5% over 90 days overall.
What would change this read
Observable measurements to watch: whether volume/market cap data becomes available to populate the liquidity component; whether the number of scored smart-money wallets rises above the 3-wallet minimum to permit a consensus reading; and whether the top-10 non-exchange concentration (48.6%–49.3%) shifts materially in either direction.
Limitations and missing data
This report lacked liquidity data, smart-money wallet breadth, news and social sentiment scoring, institutional/ETF flow tracking for crypto, and any disclosed 13F/N-PORT institutional exposure. Holder concentration figures varied slightly between sources (48.6% vs 49.3%) without reconciliation in the data provided.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
With 98.0% of supply held by ten non-exchange addresses and 0.0% in exchange custody, price-moving capacity concentrates in a small set of wallets outside exchange-tracked flows. 24h volume of $117,846,515 against a $1,549,929,979 market cap (7.60% turnover) was the liquidity reading cited by the engine.
Per the MEASURED DISAGREEMENTS block, the layers agreed: no conflict was flagged between flows, price momentum, and the fundamentals reading.
Risks
Holder concentration was the largest flagged risk: top-10 non-exchange holders at 98.0% of supply, which cost 80 points in the fundamentals factor. Exchange custody was measured at 0.0%, and tracked smart wallets at 0.0% — meaning neither layer offered an independent check on the concentrated holder base. Smart-money positioning was explicitly marked INSUFFICIENT (0 scored wallets in the consensus window), so the ACCUMULATION label from that layer cannot be read as consensus. News sentiment was empty (0 items). No unlock data was found, which is a gap, not a clean bill.
What would change this read
Observable measurements worth watching: whether top-10 non-exchange concentration moves materially from 98.0%; whether whale-wallet activity broadens beyond the 5 wallets currently driving the $27.3M/$15.5M buy-sell split; and whether news or social scored-item counts rise past their stated minimums (2 and 3 respectively) to activate those components.
Limitations and missing data
Five of eleven conviction components had no data: smartmoneyflows, newssentiment, socialsentiment, institutionalactivity, and etfflows. Institutional exposure and ETF flows are not tracked for crypto tokens in V1. Scored news for this asset was absent from the tracked feed. Unlock-schedule absence reflects tracked data only, not confirmed non-existence.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
Risks
Top-10 non-exchange concentration stood at 53.7% (−54 points to the structure score). Exchange custody was low at 0.2%. No unlock schedule was found in tracked data, though absence of a schedule is not proof of no dilution risk. Liquidity turnover was 1.29% ($97,262,750 / $7,526,976,410). Smart-money and news/social sentiment layers were empty — stated gaps, not neutral readings.
What would change this read
Observable measurements to watch: whether buy-side vs sell-side whale volume narrows from the $27.6M-vs-$2,082.3M split; whether weekly transaction counts recover toward the prior week's 1,517; whether scored wallet participation rises above the 3-wallet minimum needed for a smart-money reading.
Limitations and missing data
Missing: smart-money flows (0 scored wallets), news sentiment (0 items), social sentiment (0 items), institutional activity and ETF flows (untracked for crypto in V1). No chains beyond Ethereum were covered in this dossier. Confidence in the technical-indicators component was limited by 0.43 quality.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
Risks
Holder concentration was extreme: top-10 non-exchange holders at 86.9% (-80 points to the fundamentals component). Liquidity was thin: $1,618,652 in 24h volume against $3,611,465,857 market cap (0.04% turnover). Smart-money breadth was empty: only 0 scored wallets were active, so the 87/100 smart-money score's "ACCUMULATION" label carries an explicit INSUFFICIENT stance and cannot be read as consensus. Macro conditions contributed negatively: 16 items in 72h averaged -0.65 on the lexicon.
What would change this read
Observable measurements to watch: whether 24h volume moves materially relative to the $3,611,465,857 market cap; whether the number of scored smart-money wallets active in the consensus window rises above the 3-wallet minimum; and whether top-10 non-exchange holder concentration moves from its current 86.9%.
Limitations and missing data
This report lacked smartmoneyflows, newssentiment, socialsentiment, institutionalactivity and etfflows data for this asset. No unlock schedule entries or disclosed institutional filings were found in tracked sources. Technical indicators carried quality of only 0.59, the weakest of any populated component.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
WBTC
ZRO
wstETH
USDD
FTX Token