wstETH

Deterministic weighted aggregation (engine v1-deterministic-2026-07). Each component is an observed measurement mapped to [-1, +1]; weights are renormalized over components that actually had data (missing data contributes nothing and is never estimated); sentiment sources (news/social/macro) are capped at 20% of the total signal; score = 50 + 45 x weighted mean, bounded to 2-98 so the scale can never express certainty. Confidence is computed separately from data coverage (63% of applicable weight had data) and data quality - a high score with thin data stays low-confidence. No AI model participates in this score.

Educational description of observed on-chain positioning (772 events · 9 wallets). Not financial advice, not a prediction, and never a buy or sell recommendation.

Flow detail: wallet 0x0b925ed163218f6662a35e0f0371ac234f9e9371 showed a net outflow of $10.6M over 7 days (distribution pattern, 2026-07-27 16:43Z) but also received $15.0M (16:16Z) and $2.0M (15:25Z) in the same window — indicating transit through this address rather than one-directional movement. Wallet 0x12b54025c112aa61face2cdb7118740875a566e9 received $15.0M (16:16Z) then sent $2.5M (15:25Z) and $2.0M across two transfers (14:55Z). Wallet 0xb8a451107a9f87fde481d4d686247d6e43ed715e both sent and received $2.0M in similar four-part transfers at 14:55Z, consistent with routing rather than net accumulation or distribution by that address alone.

With exchange custody at 0.0% and tracked smart wallets at 0.0%, the holder split shown here does not indicate exchange-held supply or wallets tagged as smart-money movers — price-moving capacity concentrates in the untagged top-10 non-exchange cohort (66.9%). Volume against market cap (0.07% turnover) means a position of meaningful size would represent a large share of a single day's trading activity.

Per the measured disagreements block, no conflict was found: every layer with a reading pointed the same direction or sat within its flat band. The accumulation signal, the 7d/30d upward price move, and the 90d decline (-15.3%) were not flagged as contradictory in the source data.

Risks

• Top-10 non-exchange concentration of 66.9%, scored as a -67 point fundamentals factor.
• Turnover of 0.07% ($6,282,074 volume vs $8,875,433,351 mcap), flagged as thin liquidity.
• Macro lexicon average of -0.65 across 16 items in 72h, a counter-signal per the engine.
• Week-over-week transaction decline (655 vs 710), also flagged as a counter-signal.
• Unlock schedule and institutional exposure layers were empty — absence of scheduled unlocks or filings is stated as unconfirmed, not as a clean bill.

What would change this read

• Whether 24h turnover moves materially above the observed 0.07% of market cap.
• Whether the top-10 non-exchange holder share moves away from 66.9%.
• Whether smart-money or news/social components accumulate enough scored wallets or items (currently 0) to be carried in the score at all.

Limitations and missing data

Smart-money flows, news sentiment, social sentiment, institutional activity, and ETF flows carried zero weight in this snapshot. No unlock schedule or 13F/N-PORT institutional holding was found, though absence of tracking does not confirm absence of fact. No citable external sources were provided for this report.

This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.

AI-generated analyses are automated interpretations of public market data. They may contain errors, are provided for educational purposes only, and are not investment recommendations.