weETH · ETHEREUM
0xcd5fe23c85820f7b72d0926fc9b05b43e359b7ee
10/100
Structure health · explainable below
The information on this page is market data and educational analysis, not financial advice. Past on-chain activity does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research.
Price (USD)
$2,086.76
Market cap
$3,529,880,275
24h volume
$353,322
24h change
1.14%
What changed: No material change since 2026-07-28 02:50 UTC (score 59 → 56).
Historical context: Across 7 snapshots since 2026-07-23, the score ranged 57-61 (average 58); the current 56 is in line with that average.
Source freshness - Whale activity: 2026-07-29 01:54 UTC · Token fundamentals: 2026-07-29 01:54 UTC · Liquidity: 2026-07-29 01:54 UTC · Macro conditions: 2026-07-28 23:47 UTC
| Component | Weight | Observed |
|---|---|---|
| Whale activity | 32.3% | Across 404 whale events (5 wallets), observed buy pressure was $1577.1M vs $51.8M sell - net accumulation. |
| - Smart money flows | - | Only 0 scored wallets were active in the consensus window (minimum 3). |
| On-chain activity | 16.1% | Observed transactions fell week-over-week: 470 in the last 7 days vs 503 the week before. |
| Token fundamentals | 9.7% | Top 10 non-exchange holders held 87.0% of supply (−80 points). |
| Liquidity | 11.3% | 24h volume was $594,713 against a $3,544,654,764 market cap (0.02% turnover). |
| Technical indicators | 24.2% | Price moved -1.0% over 7 days and 19.7% over 30 days, sitting at 79% of its 30-day range. |
| - News sentiment | - | Too few scored items in 72h (0, minimum 2). |
| Social sentiment |
AI-generated analyses are automated interpretations of public market data. They may contain errors, are provided for educational purposes only, and are not investment recommendations. The information on this page is market data and educational analysis, not financial advice. Past on-chain activity does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research.
Observed positioning of scored wallets over 30 days — computed from real whale events, rule-based, never a prediction.
87/100
accumulation
50 baseline + 37 flow imbalance (net accumulation 94% of $1628.5M) + 0 breadth (0 scored wallets). Measures observed positioning, not investment quality.
Accumulation side · $1576.9M
Distribution side · $51.6M
Smart money consensus (7d · 0 scored wallets)
Insufficient scored-wallet data — no scored wallet was active on this asset in the last 7 days, so no consensus can be claimed.
Scenario weights — derived from current observed signals, not forecasts
Accumulation continues · 58%
Consolidation · 37%
Distribution pressure · 5%
Top 10 (non-exchange)
87.0%
Exchange custody
0.0%
Tracked smart wallets
0.0%
Exchange custody wallets hold aggregated customer funds and are not treated as investment ownership.
Scores describe observed market structure only — they are not predictions, ratings of future performance, or financial advice.
✓ Source data · 1 day old · newest datum 2026-07-27 17:43 UTC
✓ Written 2026-07-27 20:45 UTC · model claude-sonnet-5
✓ Platform report — generated for everyone, free to read
The deterministic conviction engine scored this asset at 61/100, direction BULLISH, confidence MEDIUM. That score sat above the 57-59 range observed across five snapshots since 2026-07-23. The dossier showed heavy whale buy-side flow ($1,403.3M vs $52.2M sell across 408 events), a price sitting at 97% of its 30-day range, and a structure health score of 10/100 driven by extreme holder concentration (top-10 non-exchange holders at 86.9%) alongside 24h turnover of just 0.04% of market cap. Coverage was partial: only 6 of 11 applicable components carried data (63.0% of applicable weight).
Of the 11 conviction components, whale activity, on-chain activity, token fundamentals, liquidity, technical indicators and macro conditions carried data. Five did not: smartmoneyflows (0 scored wallets active, minimum 3 required), newssentiment (0 scored items, minimum 2), socialsentiment (0 scored items, minimum 3), institutionalactivity and etfflows (not tracked for crypto in V1). Whale events were populated (408 events, 5 wallets, newest 2026-07-27 17:43Z). Holder structure was populated: top-10 non-exchange 86.9%, exchange custody 0.0%, tracked smart wallets 0.0%. No token unlocks were found in tracked emissions data — stated as an absence in the data, not proof none exist. No disclosed institutional exposure appeared in tracked 13F/N-PORT filings. Scored news carried nothing on this asset in the tracked feed. Price momentum data was populated: 7d +3.5%, 30d +23.4%, 90d -14.9%, -17.9% from the 90d high.
Whale activity (32.3% weight, quality 1.00) and on-chain activity (16.1% weight, quality 0.96) carried the bulk of the applicable weight and both contributed positively. Technical indicators carried the largest weight (24.2%) but the lowest quality (0.59), which most limits confidence. Wallet 0xbdfa7b7893081b35fb54027489e2bc7a38275129 showed a net inflow of $199,343,442 over 7 days (2026-07-26 22:37Z), flanked by paired $618,243 and $1,030,302 transfers minutes apart on 2026-07-26 — a pattern consistent with internal movement rather than fresh external accumulation for those specific legs. Wallet 0xdb74dfdd3bb46be8ce6c33dc9d82777bcfc3ded5 executed three WETH→weETH swaps (2026-07-26 20:37Z for $52,370; 2026-07-27 14:35Z for $193,580; 2026-07-27 17:43Z for $849,286), which are direct buys rather than transfers. With top-10 non-exchange holders controlling 86.9% of supply and exchange custody at 0.0%, price-moving capacity concentrates in a small number of non-custodial wallets; 24h volume of $1,618,652 against a $3,611,465,857 market cap indicates that exiting any sizable position would be difficult to do without moving price. Per the measured-disagreements block, the layers agreed: no conflict was recorded between flow direction and price momentum in this dossier.
Recent whale events on weETH lean toward accumulation — 4 accumulation-side vs 1 distribution-side.
Computed from the on-chain data on this page — no AI model involved. Educational, not financial advice.
| - |
| Too few scored items in 72h (0, minimum 3). |
| Macro conditions | 6.5% | Global (not token-specific): 27 economy/regulatory items in 72h averaged -0.61 on the lexicon. |
| - Institutional activity | - | Institutional flows are not tracked for crypto tokens in V1 (stocks & ETF phase). |
| - Insider activity | - | Insider activity does not apply to crypto tokens (weight 0 - excluded from coverage). |
| - ETF flows | - | ETF flow data is not tracked for crypto tokens in V1 (stocks & ETF phase). |
Deterministic weighted aggregation (engine v1-deterministic-2026-07). Each component is an observed measurement mapped to [-1, +1]; weights are renormalized over components that actually had data (missing data contributes nothing and is never estimated); sentiment sources (news/social/macro) are capped at 20% of the total signal; score = 50 + 45 x weighted mean, bounded to 2-98 so the scale can never express certainty. Confidence is computed separately from data coverage (63% of applicable weight had data) and data quality - a high score with thin data stays low-confidence. No AI model participates in this score.
Institutional Fund confidence LOW
What would a hedge fund analyst likely examine here?
A fund analyst would typically note the net accumulation and examine whether the flow is broad (many wallets) or concentrated (one actor), before treating it as a positioning signal.
Data: observed 30d flows: $1576.9M accumulation-side vs $51.6M distribution-side · 0 scored wallets active in 7d
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Whale Investor confidence LOW
What would a large holder likely watch?
A large holder would typically watch the exchange inflows as a sign that peers are staging liquidity venue-side.
Data: exchange outflows $0K vs inflows $0K (30d)
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Swing Trader confidence LOW
What would a technical trader likely track?
A swing trader would typically track whether the current accumulation side persists across sessions, using the flow imbalance as context rather than a signal by itself.
Data: observed 30d flows: $1576.9M accumulation-side vs $51.6M distribution-side
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Risk Manager confidence LOW
How would a professional frame the risk?
A risk manager would typically size any exposure against the observed concentration: flows driven by few wallets reverse faster than broad-based moves, and venue-side supply adds liquidity risk.
Data: 0 scored wallets in the 7d sample · venue-side supply $0K (30d inflows)
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Long-Term Investor confidence LOW
What would a long-horizon allocator likely note?
A long-horizon allocator would typically note that observed professional positioning leans toward accumulation, while weighing it against fundamentals this dashboard does not measure.
Data: Insufficient scored-wallet data — no scored wallet was active on this asset in the last 7 days, so no consensus can be claimed.
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Educational description of observed on-chain positioning (399 events · 5 wallets). Not financial advice, not a prediction, and never a buy or sell recommendation.
Holder concentration was extreme: top-10 non-exchange holders at 86.9% (-80 points to the fundamentals component). Liquidity was thin: $1,618,652 in 24h volume against $3,611,465,857 market cap (0.04% turnover). Smart-money breadth was empty: only 0 scored wallets were active, so the 87/100 smart-money score's "ACCUMULATION" label carries an explicit INSUFFICIENT stance and cannot be read as consensus. Macro conditions contributed negatively: 16 items in 72h averaged -0.65 on the lexicon.
Observable measurements to watch: whether 24h volume moves materially relative to the $3,611,465,857 market cap; whether the number of scored smart-money wallets active in the consensus window rises above the 3-wallet minimum; and whether top-10 non-exchange holder concentration moves from its current 86.9%.
This report lacked smartmoneyflows, newssentiment, socialsentiment, institutionalactivity and etfflows data for this asset. No unlock schedule entries or disclosed institutional filings were found in tracked sources. Technical indicators carried quality of only 0.59, the weakest of any populated component.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
AI-generated analyses are automated interpretations of public market data. They may contain errors, are provided for educational purposes only, and are not investment recommendations.
Four passes instead of one: it plans what this dossier can and cannot answer, drafts the report, attacks its own draft for unsupported claims and generic sentences, then rewrites. It ends by stating what it could not determine and which datum was missing.