WETH · ETHEREUM
0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2
64/100
Structure health · explainable below
The information on this page is market data and educational analysis, not financial advice. Past on-chain activity does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research.
Price (USD)
$1,900.83
Market cap
$4,295,961,989
24h volume
$357,736,036
24h change
1.16%
What changed: Since 2026-07-27 20:43 UTC: confidence medium → high; new data: Token fundamentals, Liquidity.
Historical context: Across 7 snapshots since 2026-07-23, the score ranged 39-59 (average 51); the current 40 is below that average.
Source freshness - Whale activity: 2026-07-29 03:44 UTC · Token fundamentals: 2026-07-29 03:44 UTC · Liquidity: 2026-07-29 03:44 UTC · On-chain activity: 2026-07-29 01:59 UTC
| Component | Weight | Observed |
|---|---|---|
| Whale activity | 32.3% | Across 3006 whale events (15 wallets), observed buy pressure was $391.6M vs $1125.4M sell - net distribution. |
| - Smart money flows | - | Only 0 scored wallets were active in the consensus window (minimum 3). |
| On-chain activity | 16.1% | Observed transactions fell week-over-week: 3799 in the last 7 days vs 13422 the week before. |
| Token fundamentals | 9.7% | Top 10 non-exchange holders held 60.1% of supply (−60 points). |
| Liquidity | 11.3% | 24h volume was $344,913,967 against a $4,279,301,564 market cap (8.06% turnover). |
| Technical indicators | 24.2% | Price moved -0.6% over 7 days and 20.3% over 30 days, sitting at 84% of its 30-day range. |
| - News sentiment | - | Too few scored items in 72h (0, minimum 2). |
| Social sentiment |
AI-generated analyses are automated interpretations of public market data. They may contain errors, are provided for educational purposes only, and are not investment recommendations. The information on this page is market data and educational analysis, not financial advice. Past on-chain activity does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research.
Observed positioning of scored wallets over 30 days — computed from real whale events, rule-based, never a prediction.
31/100
distribution
50 baseline − 19 flow imbalance (net distribution 48% of $1517.1M) − 0 breadth (0 scored wallets). Measures observed positioning, not investment quality.
Accumulation side · $391.6M
Distribution side · $1125.4M
Smart money consensus (7d · 0 scored wallets)
Insufficient scored-wallet data — no scored wallet was active on this asset in the last 7 days, so no consensus can be claimed.
Scenario weights — derived from current observed signals, not forecasts
Accumulation continues · 23%
Consolidation · 45%
Distribution pressure · 32%
Top 10 (non-exchange)
60.2%
Exchange custody
0.0%
Tracked smart wallets
0.0%
Exchange custody wallets hold aggregated customer funds and are not treated as investment ownership.
Scores describe observed market structure only — they are not predictions, ratings of future performance, or financial advice.
✓ Source data · 1 day old · newest datum 2026-07-27 18:13 UTC
✓ Written 2026-07-27 20:43 UTC · model claude-sonnet-5
✓ Platform report — generated for everyone, free to read
The deterministic engine scored WETH 39/100, direction BEARISH, confidence MEDIUM. This score, direction and confidence are three separate computed outputs, not a single verdict. The dossier showed a wallet base that sold more than it bought over the tracked window, a week-over-week decline in transaction count, and a price that moved higher over 7 and 30 days while sitting at the top of its 30-day range. Confidence was capped at medium because only 4 of 11 applicable components carried any data at all.
Whale activity, on-chain activity, technical indicators and macro conditions carried data; smart-money flows, token fundamentals, liquidity, news sentiment, social sentiment, institutional activity and ETF flows did not — seven of eleven components are stated gaps, not neutral readings. Holder structure was unavailable for this chain, so "structure score: not computable" stands as-is. No unlocks were found in tracked emissions data, which the dossier explicitly says is not proof none exist. No disclosed institutional exposure appeared in tracked 13F/N-PORT filings. No scored news items existed in the tracked feed for this asset in the last 72 hours. Price momentum came from 365 daily closes ending 2026-07-27. No citable links were supplied for this report.
Whale activity (40.8% weight) contributed -0.2: across 2,924 whale events among 15 wallets, observed buy pressure was $390.0M against sell-side $938.9M — net distribution. On-chain activity (20.4% weight) also contributed -0.2: 6,159 transactions in the last 7 days versus 10,721 the week before, a measured decline in activity. Technical indicators (30.6%) contributed +0.1, the lone positive input, but it is also flagged as the top risk to the read since price sat at 100% of its 30-day range. Confidence is most limited by the smart-money component, which had zero scored wallets active in the consensus window — the dossier is explicit that consensus cannot be claimed from a sample of zero.
Recent whale events on WETH lean toward distribution — 2 distribution-side vs 0 accumulation-side.
Computed from the on-chain data on this page — no AI model involved. Educational, not financial advice.
| - |
| Too few scored items in 72h (0, minimum 3). |
| Macro conditions | 6.5% | Global (not token-specific): 28 economy/regulatory items in 72h averaged -0.62 on the lexicon. |
| - Institutional activity | - | Institutional flows are not tracked for crypto tokens in V1 (stocks & ETF phase). |
| - Insider activity | - | Insider activity does not apply to crypto tokens (weight 0 - excluded from coverage). |
| - ETF flows | - | ETF flow data is not tracked for crypto tokens in V1 (stocks & ETF phase). |
Deterministic weighted aggregation (engine v1-deterministic-2026-07). Each component is an observed measurement mapped to [-1, +1]; weights are renormalized over components that actually had data (missing data contributes nothing and is never estimated); sentiment sources (news/social/macro) are capped at 20% of the total signal; score = 50 + 45 x weighted mean, bounded to 2-98 so the scale can never express certainty. Confidence is computed separately from data coverage (63% of applicable weight had data) and data quality - a high score with thin data stays low-confidence. No AI model participates in this score.
Institutional Fund confidence LOW
What would a hedge fund analyst likely examine here?
A fund analyst would typically flag the net distribution and examine venue inflows as potential supply overhang.
Data: observed 30d flows: $391.6M accumulation-side vs $1125.4M distribution-side · 0 scored wallets active in 7d
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Whale Investor confidence LOW
What would a large holder likely watch?
A large holder would typically watch the exchange inflows as a sign that peers are staging liquidity venue-side.
Data: exchange outflows $0K vs inflows $0K (30d)
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Swing Trader confidence LOW
What would a technical trader likely track?
A swing trader would typically track whether the current distribution side persists across sessions, using the flow imbalance as context rather than a signal by itself.
Data: observed 30d flows: $391.6M accumulation-side vs $1125.4M distribution-side
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Risk Manager confidence LOW
How would a professional frame the risk?
A risk manager would typically size any exposure against the observed concentration: flows driven by few wallets reverse faster than broad-based moves, and venue-side supply adds liquidity risk.
Data: 0 scored wallets in the 7d sample · venue-side supply $0K (30d inflows)
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Long-Term Investor confidence LOW
What would a long-horizon allocator likely note?
A long-horizon allocator would typically treat current flows as noise at their horizon and focus on fundamentals this dashboard does not measure.
Data: Insufficient scored-wallet data — no scored wallet was active on this asset in the last 7 days, so no consensus can be claimed.
On-chain flows describe PAST positioning of a small observed universe; they do not determine prices. Data can be incomplete or delayed.
Educational description of observed on-chain positioning (3006 events · 15 wallets). Not financial advice, not a prediction, and never a buy or sell recommendation.
Individual events: 0xdacc39450d67784a4648e4ce42f2789e3ba23b94 received $136.7M (five ~$27.3M transfers) at 16:57Z, $53.8M more at 16:15Z, and $105.4M at 15:48Z — large inbound clusters, not confirmed as accumulation versus internal transit. 0xbb2b8038a1640196fbe3e38816f3e67cba72d940 received $26.8M at 18:13Z and $13.5M at 16:03Z. 0xb8a451107a9f87fde481d4d686247d6e43ed715e sent $3.6M at 14:55Z.
Two disagreements were computed, not inferred. First: tracked wallet flow points down (net sold $548,822,015; bought $390,043,838, sold $938,865,853) while 30-day price points up (+24.0%). Second: the conviction score points down (39/100, bearish) while the same +24.0% 30-day price points up. Both could reflect distribution occurring into strength, or could reflect wallets rotating through a rising market without net directional conviction — the dossier does not resolve which.
Smart-money stance was labeled INSUFFICIENT with only 0 scored wallets meeting the minimum of 3 — no breadth claim is supportable. Holder concentration data was unavailable, so top-holder or exchange-custody share cannot be assessed here. Liquidity was flagged unavailable (volume or market cap missing), so exit capacity against position size cannot be evaluated. The technical reading itself is a counter-signal: 100% of the 30-day range is flagged as a risk to the bearish read, not a confirmation of it.
Watch whether the 15-wallet cohort's buy-side ($390.0M) closes the gap against sell-side ($938.9M) in a future window. Watch whether weekly transaction counts recover above the prior week's 10,721. Watch whether liquidity or holder-distribution data becomes trackable for this chain, which would change confidence independent of direction.
Seven of eleven conviction components had no data: smart-money flows, token fundamentals, liquidity, news sentiment, social sentiment, institutional activity, and ETF flows. Holder structure, market cap, 24h volume and 24h price change were all unavailable. No scored news or social items existed in the tracked 72-hour window.
This analysis is educational information, not financial advice.
AI-generated analyses are automated interpretations of public market data. They may contain errors, are provided for educational purposes only, and are not investment recommendations.
Four passes instead of one: it plans what this dossier can and cannot answer, drafts the report, attacks its own draft for unsupported claims and generic sentences, then rewrites. It ends by stating what it could not determine and which datum was missing.